Middle-Market CFOs Tag Competitive Positioning Among Top Drivers of Uncertainty
July 2024
This edition of PYMNTS Intelligence’s 2024 Certainty Project highlights CFOs’ strategies to mitigate the financial impact of middle-market uncertainty. Isolating these strategies is crucial for identifying how financial operations contribute to business stability and growth in the “real” economy. This monthly project rotates through CFOs, heads of payment and heads of product to monitor trends and sentiment across the operations of middle-market firms in the United States — those with revenues between $100 million and $1 billion.
• Uncertainty costs have increased to 17% of revenue for high-volatility firms.
• 80% of firms with most financial operations automated report low uncertainty levels; just 11% of those using less automation report the same.
• Two in three middle-market CFOs expect uncertainty to improve within a year.
Register for Unlimited Access
Complete the form below to enjoy free, unlimited access to all our Trackers, Studies and MonitorEdge Reports.
Thank you for registering. Please confirm your email to view all our Trackers.
For middle-market chief financial officers (CFOs), cash forecasting and competitive pricing are primary concerns related to uncertainty. PYMNTS Intelligence data finds that business performance had 27% of them worried in May, and key drivers for that worry include cash forecasting and cost control. Competitive position also continues to concern 25% of CFOs, with pricing a significant factor.
Why are these top of mind? For some middle-market CFOs, early-year projections may not be coming to fruition. January’s cash forecasts may start to seem overly optimistic relative to reality, intensifying concerns about competitive pricing and positioning.
As our research has found, uncertainty has real costs for middle-market businesses. Firms deemed by our research to be high-volatility businesses report increased uncertainty costs — now 17% of revenue, up from 7.1% in February. Firms operating in more predictable conditions maintain lower uncertainty costs, with percentages in the single digits.
Middle-market CFOs have made it clear that automation significantly boosts certainty for their firms. Four in five middle-market firms with most of their financial operations automated report high certainty levels. Just 11% of their counterparts with less than 25% of financial operations automated have the same sense of certainty. Automation and effective process improvements play a key role in managing uncertainty. By prioritizing these strategies, CFOs can enhance business stability and growth.
These are just some of the findings detailed in “Middle-Market CFOs Tag Competitive Positioning Among Top Drivers of Uncertainty,” the fifth edition of the PYMNTS Intelligence 2024 Certainty Project. This monthly project rotates through insights from CFOs, heads of payment and heads of product. It monitors trends in the operations of U.S. firms with revenues between $100 million and $1 billion in 2023. This edition examines how middle-market CFOs have automated processes to mitigate uncertainty’s impact on financial operations. It draws on insights from a survey of 60 heads of product from middle-market companies. The survey was held from May 6 to May 10.
Middle-market CFOs focus on the big picture, and 27% have identified business performance as their top source of uncertainty. Most of these executives cite cash forecasting and cost control as main drivers of business performance uncertainty. However, this also marks the third consecutive month in which competitive position has weighed heavily on CFOs’ sense of certainty.
Concerns over supply chain integrity and macroeconomic conditions highlight how larger external factors also remain on CFOs’ radars. These challenges require robust, strategic planning to mitigate uncertainty and maintain business stability. To navigate these uncertainties effectively, CFOs must focus on improving financial forecasting, cost control and pricing strategies.
The Increasing Costs of Uncertainty
Uncertainty’s estimated costs are increasing the most for middle-market firms operating with the highest levels of uncertainty. CFOs who operate with a high uncertainty level reported a total cost estimate of 17% of revenue, a significant rise from 7.1% several months ago. This sharp increase illustrates the compounding effect of unpredictable conditions on operational expenses and revenue loss.
As can happen when May rolls around, a number of CFOs face mid-year troubles. Projected deals may fall through or get delayed, and cash forecasts can prove increasingly uncertain or inaccurate. These firms’ CFOs are struggling to strengthen competitive positioning through pricing while battling rising costs, exacerbating their feelings of uncertainty.
While uncertainty levels remain stable for most firms, estimated revenue losses have increased overall. However, highly volatile firms have driven this increase in the average cost of uncertainty almost exclusively. Firms with low levels of uncertainty reported far smaller changes, with costs remaining relatively stable: 2.4% in May, compared to 1.6% in February.
These findings emphasize the need for effective uncertainty management strategies. Better predictability in operations helps control financial impacts, while firms in more volatile environments face escalating costs. Robust, strategic planning and ongoing operational adjustments are essential to reduce these rising costs and maintain business stability.
Uncertainty’s impact is down — except in key areas
Uncertainty’s impact remains significant in key areas. The share of middle-market firms experiencing errors and delays rose to 38%, for example. Similarly, the share of CFOs reporting missed opportunities jumped to 35%, and the share reporting lost revenue rose to 22%. These areas highlight how uncertainty in cash forecasting and pricing can lead to real financial impacts.
However, CFOs have gained an edge in the ongoing struggle to manage costs and maintain stability despite fluctuating market conditions. Although more CFOs report that uncertainty has diminished profits, the shares reporting customer issues and churn have recently decreased. Likewise, fewer CFOs noted uncertainty’s impact on supply issues.
Are analytics taking a back seat to other strategies?
Data shows that CFOs have been far less likely to use analytics lately, with greater emphasis placed on process improvements to mitigate uncertainty. Just 25% of CFOs reported using analytics to forecast trends and gain insights — a significant drop over the past several months. Similarly, just 17% reported that their firms incorporated process automation. This shift hints at the recent emphasis on strategies that use more immediate and tangible methods to manage uncertainty.
In May, 47% of CFOs reported introducing new processes and workflows to mitigate uncertainty. This focus on process improvements illustrates CFOs’ recent emphasis on enhancing operational efficiency and stability. While reliance on analytics and automation decreased, adopting new workflows remains a prominent strategy. This suggests that CFOs are prioritizing practical, actionable approaches to navigate uncertain conditions effectively — and recognizing the immediate benefits of streamlined processes and enhanced workflow management.
Workflow Improvements Increase Certainty Levels
CFOs are seeing positive results from the practical benefits of streamlined processes and enhanced workflow management. Data shows that process automation, data collection, new workflows and dedicating human resources effectively mitigate uncertainty.
In May, CFOs reported high effectiveness for process automation and data collection, highlighting their reliability in improving operational efficiency. New workflows achieved a 97% success rate in mitigating uncertainty. These practical, actionable approaches highlight the value CFOs place on solutions that drive operational efficiency and provide stability in uncertain conditions.
Automation’s Impact on Uncertainty
Middle-market CFOs with more thoroughly automated financial operations are almost eight times more likely to report high certainty than those with less automated operations. Specifically, 80% of middle-market companies with more than half of their financial operations automated report high levels of certainty. By contrast, only 11% of firms with less than one-quarter of their operations automated experience the same level of certainty.
Automation streamlines routine tasks, such as invoice processing, transaction management and reconciliation. This can free up finance teams to focus on higher-value, bigger-picture activities like strategic planning and analysis. This shift lets CFOs navigate volatile markets with greater certainty and control around a major source of uncertainty: cash forecasting. By integrating new technologies and automating processes, firms can significantly reduce uncertainty and improve overall business stability.
Conclusion
Many middle-market CFOs have found workflow improvements are central to mitigating uncertainty’s financial and operational impacts. Likewise, process automation makes a significant impact on uncertainty by enhancing operational efficiency and stability. Firms with highly automated financial operations report much higher levels of certainty, underscoring the value of streamlined processes and effective workflow management in navigating uncertain conditions.
Looking ahead, CFOs have increased optimism, with 65% expecting uncertainty to improve in the next 12 months. Even those CFOs currently experiencing high levels of uncertainty are optimistic, with most anticipating improvements in the next year. Despite taking fewer actions to mitigate uncertainty than earlier in the year, CFOs are focusing on more effective strategies, indicating a shift toward quality over quantity. This trend suggests that middle-market CFOs are becoming more strategic and targeted in navigating and reducing uncertainty, positioning their firms for greater stability and growth in the coming year.
Methodology
“The 2024 Certainty Project: Middle-Market CFOs Tag Competitive Positioning Among Top Drivers of Uncertainty” is the fifth edition of the PYMNTS Intelligence Certainty Project. This monthly project monitors trends across operational areas of companies with $100 million to $1 billion in revenue last year. Each month, the project rotates through CFOs, heads of payment and heads of product to capture uncertainty’s sources and costs. The series also captures the strategies that executives use to deal with complex and dynamic business environments.
This issue explores the strategies that 60 surveyed CFOs use to keep their company’s financial operations on track in a volatile environment. Ninety-seven percent of the businesses have operated for 10 years or more, with 7% operating between five and 10 years. The survey was held from May 6 to May 10.
PYMNTS Intelligence is a leading global data and analytics platform that uses proprietary data and methods to provide actionable insights on what’s now and what’s next in payments, commerce and the digital economy. Its team of data scientists include leading economists, econometricians, survey experts, financial analysts and marketing scientists with deep experience in the application of data to the issues that define the future of the digital transformation of the global economy. This multilingual team has conducted original data collection and analysis in more than three dozen global markets for some of the world’s leading publicly traded and privately held firms.
The PYMNTS Intelligence team that produced this report:
SVP and Head of Analytics: Scott Murray
Managing Director: Aitor Ortiz
SVP, Data Products: Yvonni Markaki, PhD
Senior Writer: Adam Putz, PhD
We are interested in your feedback on this report. If you have questions
or
comments, or if you would like to subscribe to this report, please email
us at
feedback@pymnts.com.
Disclaimer
The 2024 Certainty Project may be updated periodically. While reasonable efforts are made to keep the content accurate and up to date, PYMNTS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE CORRECTNESS, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, ADEQUACY, OR RELIABILITY OF OR THE USE OF OR RESULTS THAT MAY BE GENERATED FROM THE USE OF THE INFORMATION OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL SATISFY YOUR REQUIREMENTS OR EXPECTATIONS. THE CONTENT IS PROVIDED “AS IS” AND ON AN “AS AVAILABLE” BASIS. YOU EXPRESSLY AGREE THAT YOUR USE OF THE CONTENT IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK. PYMNTS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY INTERRUPTIONS IN THE CONTENT THAT IS PROVIDED AND DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THE CONTENT, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NONINFRINGEMENT AND TITLE. SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN WARRANTIES, AND, IN SUCH CASES, THE STATED EX CLUSIONS DO NOT APPLY. PYMNTS RESERVES THE RIGHT AND SHOULD NOT BE LIABLE SHOULD IT EXERCISE ITS RIGHT TO MODIFY, INTERRUPT, OR DISCONTINUE THE AVAILABILITY OF THE CONTENT OR ANY COMPONENT OF IT WITH OR WITHOUT NOTICE.
PYMNTS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, AND, IN PARTICULAR, SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, OR DAMAGES FOR LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF REVENUE, OR LOSS OF USE, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE CONTENT, WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES ARISE IN CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, TORT, UNDER STATUTE, IN EQUITY, AT LAW, OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF PYMNTS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR THE LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, AND IN SUCH CASES SOME OF THE ABOVE LIMITATIONS DO NOT APPLY. THE ABOVE DISCLAIMERS AND LIMITATIONS ARE PROVIDED BY PYMNTS AND ITS PARENTS, AFFILIATED AND RELATED COMPANIES, CONTRACTORS, AND SPONSORS, AND EACH OF ITS RESPECTIVE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, MEMBERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, CONTENT COMPONENT PROVIDERS, LICENSORS, AND ADVISERS.
Components of the content original to and the compilation produced by PYMNTS is the property of PYMNTS and cannot be reproduced without its prior written permission.