Buy Now, Pay Later Special Report

New Data: Defining the New Buy Now, Pay Later Consumer

June 2024

It has outlived allegations of being a fad. Circa June 2024, buy now, pay later finds itself an established part of the financial services ecosystem. A compelling and dynamic financial instrument for consumers, it has become a burgeoning sector on its own. As such, it is an opportune time for a detailed picture of why BNPL use is growing and what consumers are using it for.

63% of BNPL users report that cash flow management is an important reason they chose to use BNPL.
Nearly 50% of Generation Z and millennial consumers have used BNPL in the past 12 months.
Overall, more consumers use BNPL strategically as a choice to manage cash flow than use it out of necessity to cover a need.


Register for Unlimited Access
Complete the form below to enjoy free, unlimited access to all our Trackers, Studies and MonitorEdge Reports.

Thank you for registering. Please confirm your email to view all our Trackers.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today
    By completing this form, I have read and acknowledged the terms and conditions.


    This report will detail the current state of this rapidly growing alternative to traditional credit. “Defining The New BNPL Consumer” also provides insight as to how BNPL will develop in the future. PYMNTS Intelligence uncovered fresh evidence around BNPL users’ demographics as well as spending patterns to surface these findings.

    In short: Our report found that heavy usage of BNPL plans for everyday essentials is contributing to its emergence as a financial management tool. Despite its rapid growth, there is still plenty of runway for BNPL’s future as a consumer-focused (and eventually a business-focused) tool.

    Readers can expect to learn the importance of financial management and cash flow in consumer attitudes toward BNPL, the product categories shoppers use it for and why, surprising results about the customer segments that are the most prolific BNPL users and more.

    Before we detail our key findings, a bit of background and definition of terms is called for. There are four general categories of BNPL providers, including consumer-facing solution providers, white-label providers and tech enablers, traditional credit-based installment plans and neobanks and challenger banks that offer their own brand of installments. This report will focus on consumer-facing BNPL providers such as Affirm, PayPal, Klarna and Sezzle.



    Key Findings Overview

    The most common reason consumers use BNPL is to manage their cash flow. Nearly two-thirds of users cite cash flow management as an important reason they chose BNPL.

    Consumers under the age of 44 are its most avid users. Forty-six percent of Generation Z and 47% of millennials have used BNPL in the past 12 months. Additionally, consumers were likelier to have used BNPL more often for their most recent online transaction (1.5%) than their most recent offline transaction (0.2%).

    Overall, 78% of BNPL users report high satisfaction with BNPL services. This satisfaction reflects their widespread acceptance and positive reception. This shift in preference to more flexible and manageable payment options underscores BNPL’s growing importance in consumer finance.

    The Psychology of the BNPL Consumer

    When it first appeared on the scene as a standalone financial services category, BNPL was generally touted as a way for lower-income consumers or consumers having low credit scores to access installment payments. And, the thought was, consumers could do this with BNPL companies without a rigorous credit check.

    In today’s reality, our research shows that consumers use BNPL primarily for two reasons: managing cash flow and accessing credit. For the group of consumers our report calls “necessity users,” who often have lower incomes and limited access to traditional credit, BNPL offers a way to make essential purchases like clothing and groceries on a limited budget. “Choice users” have higher incomes and use BNPL as a strategic tool to optimize cash flow and manage payment for larger purchases. Additionally, choice users tend to spend more on average using BNPL ($777) than necessity users ($576).

    Taken as a whole, we split BNPL user answers to our questionnaire by “most important” and “selected [as important] but not the most important.” It is interesting that among the most important reasons consumers use BNPL is to manage spend on large purchases, detailed later in this report.

    BNPL vs. the field

    PYMNTS Intelligence data also compared BNPL plans to other payment methods. Consumers use general-purpose credit card-linked installment plans to cover the largest average purchase amount at $2,095. Installment plans using store cards follow at $1,521. The average transaction for BNPL is $926. While consumers largely reserve credit card-linked installments for big-ticket items, averages suggest they use BNPL for smaller splurges.

    However, BNPL still does well with consumers spending over $1,000 in certain categories. For example, for travel and leisure purchases that large, 9.1% of consumers used BNPL, leading other installment options. Likewise, of the products that consumers split into installments using BNPL and cost more than $1,000, 29% were in home furnishings and appliances. Overall, BNPL leads other installment types in 5 of 13 product categories.

    Consumers appreciate BNPL for its convenience. Forty-three percent of users cited its ease of use as the most common reason they chose BNPL in the last 12 months. Likewise, a quarter of BNPL users appreciate its flexible repayment terms. These trends underscore BNPL’s role in providing flexible financial solutions to diverse consumer segments.

    The Profile of the BNPL Consumer

    Now that we know how consumers think about BNPL, let’s explore the profile of the various consumer segments that use it the most. On a general level, we found that 47% of parents with children were heavy BNPL users, with more than one-quarter of them choosing it instead of other available credit options. BNPL adoption rates are highest among Gen Z and millennial consumers, demonstrating the wide appeal of BNPL to populations still building their spending power.

    Notably, while most generations used BNPL strategically as choice users, Gen Z shoppers where more likely to use BNPL out of necessity. Around one-third of high-income consumers use BNPL, yet middle-income consumers are most likely to use BNPL, at 38%. In line with our necessity user hypothesis, consumers living with monthly budget limitations and have a lower income are also more likely to use BNPL programs to lessen the upfront cost of needed purchases.

    For example, paycheck-to-paycheck customers who have issues paying their bills are using BNPL at a significant 43% clip. When we sliced the data by “necessity users,” however, only 14% of our total sample used BNPL. This highlights that despite early assumptions, BNPL is often a choice, suggesting general BNPL growth can continue its upward trajectory. It is also significant that 25% of consumers who make more than $100,000 annually are using BNPL by choice.

    BNPL bests credit for everyday items, especially online

    BNPL is often considered a Gen Z or millennial payment method. Our findings confirmed there is something to that perception. Although 23% of consumers would use BNPL for everyday items, this figure climbs considerably among younger users. The share for Gen Z consumers is 28% and for millennials, 35%. In comparison, 22% of consumers would use general-purpose credit card-linked installments for everyday items. While 30% of Gen Z still reaches for a traditional payment method to make a regular purchase, 25% of millennials do. These age groups generally outpace others in electing to cover everyday items with BNPL.

    What the BNPL Consumer Is Spending On

    Again, separating the respondents by necessity and choice, we found consumers used BNPL for a surprising level of everyday purchases. By necessity, 40% of BNPL consumers used the method for clothing and accessories purchases in the last year. Groceries came in third at 22%, with everyday categories like gasoline and health and beauty products also strong. Fourteen percent of necessity users purchased luxury goods.

    We then turned our attention to larger purchases — products costing more than $1,000. Home furnishings and appliances were by far the most popular for BNPL usage. Technology and electronics followed in second place.

    All the same, consumers use BNPL on a wide range of items and often over other installment options. For example, one-third of consumers used BNPL for clothing and accessories in the last year. Likewise, electronics and home furnishings show significant BNPL consumer usage, at 23% and 19% respectively. Alongside its heavy use on everyday items, these big-ticket purchase patterns underscore BNPL’s versatility.

    The heavy use of BNPL for everyday essentials like groceries highlights its role in managing routine expenses for some consumers. In their most recent transactions, many turned to BNPL for its convenience and flexibility: 14% for necessity users and 16% for choice users. However, 12% of necessity users said they had no other option to afford a purchase without BNPL. Just 4.3% of choice users said the same.

    Conclusion

    BNPL’s evolution into a preferred financing option reflects a shift in consumer payment preferences. The method’s simplicity and convenience, which enables installment payments without interest over a short timeframe, appeals to many consumers. As the digital economy expands, BNPL’s role in consumer finance should continue to grow. BNPL providers need to enhance user experiences, experiment with payment plans and leverage data analytics in partnership with merchant networks.

    Understanding BNPL users’ unique preferences and spending behaviors is essential for optimizing these services. Merchants should focus on promoting BNPL for smaller purchases to attract cost-conscious consumers and leverage partnerships to enhance customer satisfaction and retention. After all, a robust merchant network and userbase is crucial for BNPL providers.

    About

    PYMNTS INTELLIGENCE

    PYMNTS Intelligence is a leading global data and analytics platform that uses proprietary data and methods to provide actionable insights on what’s now and what’s next in payments, commerce and the digital economy. Its team of data scientists include leading economists, econometricians, survey experts, financial analysts and marketing scientists with deep experience in the application of data to the issues that define the future of the digital transformation of the global economy. This multilingual team has conducted original data collection and analysis in more than three dozen global markets for some of the world’s leading publicly traded and privately held firms.

    The PYMNTS Intelligence team that produced this report:
    Scott Murray: SVP and Head of Analytics
    Adam Putz, PhD: Senior Writer
    John Gaffney: Chief Content Officer


    We are interested in your feedback on this report. If you have questions or comments, or if you would like to subscribe to this report, please email us at feedback@pymnts.com.

    Disclaimer

    The Buy Now, Pay Later Special Report may be updated periodically. While reasonable efforts are made to keep the content accurate and up to date, PYMNTS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE CORRECTNESS, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, ADEQUACY, OR RELIABILITY OF OR THE USE OF OR RESULTS THAT MAY BE GENERATED FROM THE USE OF THE INFORMATION OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL SATISFY YOUR REQUIREMENTS OR EXPECTATIONS. THE CONTENT IS PROVIDED “AS IS” AND ON AN “AS AVAILABLE” BASIS. YOU EXPRESSLY AGREE THAT YOUR USE OF THE CONTENT IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK. PYMNTS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY INTERRUPTIONS IN THE CONTENT THAT IS PROVIDED AND DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THE CONTENT, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NONINFRINGEMENT AND TITLE. SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN WARRANTIES, AND, IN SUCH CASES, THE STATED EXCLUSIONS DO NOT APPLY. PYMNTS RESERVES THE RIGHT AND SHOULD NOT BE LIABLE SHOULD IT EXERCISE ITS RIGHT TO MODIFY, INTERRUPT, OR DISCONTINUE THE AVAILABILITY OF THE CONTENT OR ANY COMPONENT OF IT WITH OR WITHOUT NOTICE.
    PYMNTS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, AND, IN PARTICULAR, SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, OR DAMAGES FOR LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF REVENUE, OR LOSS OF USE, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE CONTENT, WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES ARISE IN CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, TORT, UNDER STATUTE, IN EQUITY, AT LAW, OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF PYMNTS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
    SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR THE LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, AND IN SUCH CASES SOME OF THE ABOVE LIMITATIONS DO NOT APPLY. THE ABOVE DISCLAIMERS AND LIMITATIONS ARE PROVIDED BY PYMNTS AND ITS PARENTS, AFFILIATED AND RELATED COMPANIES, CONTRACTORS, AND SPONSORS, AND EACH OF ITS RESPECTIVE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, MEMBERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, CONTENT COMPONENT PROVIDERS, LICENSORS, AND ADVISERS.
    Components of the content original to and the compilation produced by PYMNTS is the property of PYMNTS and cannot be reproduced without its prior written permission.